Adam Podlaskowski
University of Connecticut at Storrs UConn
Department:
Philosophy
Professors: Respond to evaluations by creating an account
Report This Evaluation as Inappropriate
Please select the category that best reflects your concern about this rating, so that we can review it and remove it if necessary. Abusing this feature wil get your account banned and/or cripple your ability to flag ratings in the future.
Positive:
Good professor.
I would recommend this professor
Is interesting/entertaining/funny
Is creative
Motivates students to do well
Is willing to help students anytime
Has enthusiasm in the classroom
Comes to class organized
Negative:
Report This Evaluation as Inappropriate
Please select the category that best reflects your concern about this rating, so that we can review it and remove it if necessary. Abusing this feature wil get your account banned and/or cripple your ability to flag ratings in the future.
This class isn't that bad at all....just go to discussion because the TA"s go over everything that he said in lecture. He basically spells out every argument you go over and for the two exams all you really need to know are the slides. The only thing is when you ask a question it takes him 20 minutes to answer it because he will make stupid jokes...overall not too bad for a gen ed
Positive:
Has enthusiasm in the classroom
Comes to class organized
Negative:
Poor sense of humor
Report This Evaluation as Inappropriate
Please select the category that best reflects your concern about this rating, so that we can review it and remove it if necessary. Abusing this feature wil get your account banned and/or cripple your ability to flag ratings in the future.
I don't know how people rated that his tests were too difficult...its philosophy 101 aka the lowest one you can take. Before the exams he pretty much told you what to expect for essays and there were 7 choices and you had to choose one. He was really funny and friendly outside of class. I never read, I just went to class and discussion and reread my notes before the exams and I ended up with and A. If you're looking to take a philosophy just for a gen ed definitely take this. If you genuinely like philosophy, i wouldnt recommend him just because theres really no individual thinking...the exams are just based on memory. As long as you know the problem and objections and can repeat it, you'll get an A
Positive:
Good professor.
I would recommend this professor
Is interesting/entertaining/funny
Is creative
Brings discussion into the classroom
Motivates students to do well
Shows a great knowledge of subject matter
Has enthusiasm in the classroom
Comes to class organized
Negative:
Report This Evaluation as Inappropriate
Please select the category that best reflects your concern about this rating, so that we can review it and remove it if necessary. Abusing this feature wil get your account banned and/or cripple your ability to flag ratings in the future.
Positive:
Is creative
Is willing to help students anytime
Has enthusiasm in the classroom
Negative:
Confusing or hard to understand
Notes/lecture is confusing
Report This Evaluation as Inappropriate
Please select the category that best reflects your concern about this rating, so that we can review it and remove it if necessary. Abusing this feature wil get your account banned and/or cripple your ability to flag ratings in the future.
Positive:
Brings discussion into the classroom
Motivates students to do well
Is willing to help students anytime
Shows a love of teaching
Negative: